![]() |
| Las Meninas mystudio.com |
A Bar at the Folies-Bergère
is primarily an Impressionist painting, and it is this technique which brings
the viewer onto a level of real experience. First and foremost this painting
has been described as a modern rendition of Velasquez’s Las Meninas. The latter’s masterpiece was executed in such a way as
if it was actually capturing a filmic scene and as a result the viewer gets the
feeling that he/she is indeed stepping into an intimate family setting. The
same effect is achieved with A Bar at the Folies Bergère, though this time
instead of making us feel that we are misplaced, Manet draws us to it and
creates an invisible connection between portraiture and the audience.
![]() |
| A Bar at the Folies-Bergère impressionist-art-gallery.com |
![]() |
| Le Dejeuner sur l'herbe seelvage.com |
As for the very technique of impressionism, the dry thick strokes
of colour create texture and induce an intense sensory experience. As such the
visual becomes enough to evoke a feel of ‘synaesthesia’; we want to touch it,
we feel the atmosphere, we experience it. The blurred figures in the ‘mirror’
background are enough to impart the shimmer, the frolic and the intoxicated
bliss of Paris nightlife at the Folies-Bergère. Yet, it is the foreground which
is of main concern. The display at the bar is equally intensely sensual, and
thus Manet seems to be showing how the visual in our consumerism society lures
us to indulge. It’s all about what we see and, in the words of Marshall
McLuhan, ‘it is never the content that counts’. Then, we may question, what
about the bar maid? Her depiction is also very visually arresting, decorative
and sensual. Is she on display too? Is she also an object of desire? Since
portraiture is very much to do with emotion and identity, this is what we might
think. She is melancholic, obviously not happy with her situation. In this way
the idea of prostitution is subtly raised and maybe even condemned. This
reminds us of Manet’s other work which was controversial during his own time,
the Dejeuner sur l’herbe. In that
painting Manet flouted the traditional idealized version of female nudes and
showed a crude reality that could be said to be hinting at prostitution.
Manet intentionally avoids fixed point perspective to create
a two-way traffic with the viewer. The bar maid is improperly reflected into
the mirror as in the mirror she seems to be addressing a man. This could
however hint at a past situation which led to that melancholic expression in
the frontal portrait. From another perspective, given the blurry man is a
reflection of what is in front of the bar maid, and what is in front of her is
us, Manet seems to make that figure a portrait of us, the viewer. What is that
man asking from the bar maid? Could it be some sensual favours? In other words,
Manet makes us part of his artwork and exposes us as the ones who are lured by
modern society’s visual culture.
At the end of the day, we cannot but awe at the ingenuity of
the presention of ideas through this unconventional use of perspective.
And as we move onto the next painting in the hall, we do
feel that, yes, we’ve just left the Folies Bergère.



well done. A very complex painting to try and unpick and you have made a bold attempt at this. Good use of the blog format. This could be a great way for you to see your thought evolving. making connections and associations.
ReplyDelete